Posts

Served With a Merchant Cash Advance Lawsuit? Here’s What to Do Next

A step-by-step guide for business owners facing an MCA summons, complaint, or collection lawsuit — and the deadlines you can’t afford to miss.

Getting served with a merchant cash advance lawsuit is one of the most stressful moments a small business owner can face. One day the daily withdrawals are draining your account; the next, a process server hands you a summons and complaint, or you find court papers taped to your door. The document is full of legal language, the deadline is short, and the funder is demanding the entire balance at once. It’s easy to freeze — but freezing is the one thing you can’t afford to do.

An MCA lawsuit moves fast and plays by rules most owners have never seen. The good news is that being sued is not the same as losing. Merchant cash advance agreements are frequently vulnerable to legal challenge, and owners who respond quickly and correctly often reduce what they owe, restructure the debt, or get cases dismissed entirely. This guide explains exactly what an MCA summons and complaint mean, the deadlines that control your fate, the defenses that work, and the steps to take the moment you’re served with an MCA lawsuit.

Above all, understand this: the worst response to a merchant cash advance lawsuit is no response. Funders count on frightened owners freezing up and letting the deadline slide, because a case nobody defends is the easiest kind to win. Everything that follows in this guide is built around a single principle — respond quickly, respond correctly, and negotiate or fight from a position of knowledge rather than panic.

Quick answer If you’ve been served with a merchant cash advance lawsuit, you typically have 20–30 days to file a formal response. Do not ignore it — missing the deadline lets the funder win a default judgment automatically. Read the summons for your deadline, avoid contacting the funder before you understand your defenses, and speak with an MCA defense attorney right away.

What Is a Merchant Cash Advance Lawsuit?

A merchant cash advance lawsuit is a civil collection action filed by an MCA funder (or a debt buyer that purchased the account) to recover money it claims you owe under a merchant cash advance agreement. Unlike an ordinary bank loan default, MCA cases often escalate quickly because the agreements are designed to give funders fast, aggressive remedies.

Remember that an MCA is structured as a purchase of your future receivables, not a loan. When your sales drop and you can no longer cover the daily or weekly withdrawals, the funder typically declares a default and sues for the outstanding balance — sometimes plus fees, interest, and attorney costs. In many cases the lawsuit arrives alongside, or instead of, a confession of judgment. Understanding whether you were sued through a normal complaint or hit with a confession of judgment changes your options completely, which is why reading the papers carefully is the essential first step.

Who Is Actually Suing You?

Before you respond, it’s worth knowing who filed the case, because it affects your strategy. A merchant cash advance lawsuit generally comes from one of two sources.

The original funder

This is the company that gave you the advance. They have the original agreement, your payment records, and a direct stake in collecting. Cases from the original funder tend to be better documented, which cuts both ways: they can prove the agreement more easily, but their own records can also expose reconciliation failures, miscalculations, or usurious terms.

A debt buyer or collection assignee

Sometimes the funder sells or assigns the account to a third party that then sues in its own name. Debt buyers often have incomplete paperwork — missing assignments, gaps in the payment history, or no clear chain of ownership. When the party suing you can’t actually prove it owns the debt or document the full balance, that failure of proof can become one of the strongest defenses available. Identifying who’s on the other side, and whether they can back up their claims, is part of what a careful review of the complaint reveals.

MCA Summons vs. MCA Complaint: Know the Difference

When you’re served, you’ll usually receive two documents together. Confusing them — or missing what each requires — is one of the most common and costly mistakes owners make.

The MCA summons

The MCA summons is the official court notice telling you that you’ve been sued and that you must respond within a set time. It names the court, the parties, and — most importantly — your deadline to answer. The summons is what starts your clock. If you take only one thing from the papers, take the response deadline printed on the summons.

The MCA complaint

The MCA complaint is the funder’s actual set of allegations. It lays out what they claim happened: the agreement you signed, the amount advanced, the payments made, the alleged default, and the total they say you owe. The complaint is your roadmap — it tells you exactly what you have to defend against, and it often contains errors, overstated balances, or claims that don’t match your records. A careful reading of the complaint is where many defenses begin.

The Deadline That Controls Everything

Here is the single most important fact about a merchant cash advance lawsuit: you have a limited window to respond, and missing it can cost you the entire case.

Depending on the state and court, you generally have somewhere between 20 and 30 days from the date you were served to file a formal answer or motion. If you don’t respond in time, the funder can ask the court for a default judgment — a ruling in their favor granted simply because you didn’t show up. A default judgment gives the funder the power to freeze your business accounts, garnish receivables, place liens on assets, and pursue you (and any personal guarantor) for the full amount. Fighting a judgment after it’s entered is far harder than responding to the lawsuit on time. The deadline is not a suggestion; it is the hinge the whole case turns on.

Defenses to a Merchant Cash Advance Lawsuit

Being sued is not the same as being defeated. MCA agreements are frequently open to serious legal challenge, and a well-prepared response can shift the leverage dramatically. These are the defenses that most often move an MCA lawsuit.

The agreement is a disguised, usurious loan

If a court finds that your MCA was really a loan rather than a genuine purchase of receivables, state usury caps may apply — and rates far above those caps can make the agreement void or unenforceable. Courts look at whether repayment truly depended on your sales, whether there was a real reconciliation mechanism, and whether the funder actually bore the risk of your business slowing down. The more the deal guaranteed the funder a fixed return no matter what, the more it looks like an illegal loan.

This defense is often the centerpiece of a strong MCA lawsuit response. Because the effective annualized cost of many advances runs well into the triple digits, a finding that the agreement is a loan can be devastating to the funder’s case — potentially wiping out the obligation or slashing it dramatically. Your bank records and payment history are the evidence that builds this argument, showing whether the funder ever truly shared your downside or simply collected a fixed return dressed up as a purchase.

Breach of the reconciliation provision

Many MCA agreements promise that if revenue falls, payments will be reduced. When a funder ignores a proper reconciliation request and keeps pulling the full amount, it may be in breach of its own contract — a defense that can also become a counterclaim against the funder.

Improper service or lack of jurisdiction

Funders sometimes sue in a distant state under a venue clause, or serve the papers improperly. If the court lacks jurisdiction over you, or you weren’t served correctly, those procedural defects can be raised to challenge the lawsuit.

Errors and overstated balances in the complaint

Complaints frequently misstate how much you actually owe — failing to credit payments already made, adding improper fees, or demanding balances that assume no reconciliation. Forcing the funder to prove its numbers is a legitimate and often productive defense. In discovery, the funder must produce records supporting every dollar it claims; when those records don’t add up, or don’t exist, the case can weaken quickly. It’s not unusual for the amount a funder sues for to shrink substantially once its own math is put under scrutiny.

Unlicensed lending or missing disclosures

A growing number of states require commercial financing disclosures or licensing for certain MCA activity. Where a funder operated without required licensing or skipped mandated disclosures, additional defenses may open up.

What to Do the Moment You’re Served With an MCA Lawsuit

How you react in the first few days often decides the outcome. Follow these steps in order.

  • Write down the date you were served. Your entire response deadline is measured from this date. Note it immediately.
  • Read the summons for your deadline. Find the exact number of days you have to respond and the court where the case was filed.
  • Read the complaint carefully. Note every allegation, the balance claimed, and anything that doesn’t match your records.
  • Gather your documents. Pull the MCA agreement, bank statements, payment history, and any reconciliation requests you made.
  • Do not contact the funder to “work it out” first. Statements you make can be used against you, and you may waive rights before you understand your defenses.
  • Do not empty or abandon your business account. Moving money to dodge collection can look like fraud and damage your defense.
  • Speak with an MCA defense attorney right away. The earlier counsel gets involved, the more options you keep and the stronger your response.

What Happens If You Ignore an MCA Lawsuit

Ignoring a merchant cash advance lawsuit doesn’t make it disappear — it hands the funder a win. When you don’t respond by the deadline, the court can enter a default judgment against you and any personal guarantor. With a judgment in hand, the funder can typically:

  • Freeze or restrain your business bank accounts.
  • Garnish or intercept your receivables and merchant processing.
  • Place liens on business assets.
  • Pursue the personal assets of anyone who signed a guarantee.

Every one of these outcomes is far harder to undo than it is to prevent. Responding on time — even just to buy room to negotiate — keeps the funder from taking these steps unilaterally and preserves your ability to fight back or settle on reasonable terms. If you want a deeper look at how attorneys build these defenses, this merchant cash advance lawsuit defense guide from CredibleLaw walks through the process in more detail.

The MCA Lawsuit Timeline at a Glance

Every case is different, but most merchant cash advance lawsuits follow a recognizable path. Knowing where you are in it helps you understand how much time and leverage you still have.

StageWhat HappensYour Move
ServiceYou receive the summons and complaintRecord the date; read both documents
Response windowUsually 20–30 days to answerFile an answer or motion on time
Answer filedYou assert defenses and counterclaimsPreserve leverage; open negotiations
DiscoveryBoth sides exchange documentsForce the funder to prove its numbers
ResolutionSettlement, dismissal, or judgmentAim for reduction or restructure

Can You Settle a Merchant Cash Advance Lawsuit?

Yes — and many MCA lawsuits end in settlement rather than trial. Funders frequently prefer a realistic negotiated payment over the time, cost, and uncertainty of litigating a case where their agreement might be found to be a disguised loan. That reality is your leverage.

A strong response to the lawsuit is often what makes a good settlement possible. Once you’ve filed an answer raising legitimate defenses — usury, breach of reconciliation, faulty documentation, or an overstated balance — the funder has to weigh the risk of losing against the certainty of a reasonable settlement. Depending on the case, a settlement might reduce the total balance, pause or lower withdrawals, consolidate stacked advances, or convert a crushing daily debit into a sustainable payment plan. The key is that you negotiate from a position of strength, after your defenses are on the table, rather than pleading for mercy before you’ve responded.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long do I have to respond to an MCA lawsuit?

Typically 20 to 30 days from the date you were served, depending on the state and court. The exact deadline is printed on your summons. Missing it can result in a default judgment against you.

What happens if I was served with an MCA summons but ignore it?

The funder can request a default judgment, which lets them freeze accounts, garnish receivables, and pursue personal guarantors — all without further input from you. Responding on time is essential.

Can I fight a merchant cash advance lawsuit and win?

Yes. MCA agreements are frequently challengeable — as disguised usurious loans, for breach of reconciliation, for improper service, or for overstated balances. Many cases end in dismissal, reduced settlements, or restructured payments when handled properly.

Should I call the funder after I’m served?

Not before you understand your defenses. Statements you make can be used against you, and informal “settlement” talks can waive important rights. Speak with an attorney first.

What’s the difference between an MCA summons and an MCA complaint?

The summons is the court’s notice that you’ve been sued and states your deadline to respond. The complaint is the funder’s list of allegations and the amount they claim you owe. You need both to respond effectively.

Can an MCA funder freeze my bank account through a lawsuit?

Once a funder obtains a judgment — including a default judgment from an ignored lawsuit — it can move to restrain business accounts and garnish receivables. An attorney can fight to release frozen funds and challenge the judgment.

Get Help Before the Deadline Passes

A merchant cash advance lawsuit is serious, but it is defensible — and the owners who fare best are the ones who act quickly. If you’ve been served with an MCA summons or complaint, the clock is already running. Before you respond, contact the funder, or sign anything, it’s worth understanding your rights and defenses from someone who handles these cases.

For a detailed breakdown of how MCA defense attorneys approach these disputes, see our guide on what an MCA defense attorney does and when to bring one in. If you’re facing an active lawsuit, don’t wait until the deadline is gone — the sooner you understand your options, the more of them you’ll have.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Deadlines and procedures vary by state and court — consult a licensed attorney about your specific situation as soon as possible.

What an MCA Defense Attorney Actually Does — And When You Need One

A practical guide for business owners facing merchant cash advance debt, confessions of judgment, and aggressive collection tactics.

If you run a small business, a merchant cash advance can feel like a lifeline right up until it becomes a trap. The money arrives fast, the paperwork looks simple, and the daily or weekly withdrawals start before you’ve fully read what you signed. Then revenue dips, the fixed payments don’t, and suddenly a funder is threatening to freeze your bank account or file a judgment against you in a state you’ve never set foot in. That is the moment most owners start searching for an MCA defense attorney — and it is usually the moment they discover how different merchant cash advance disputes are from ordinary business debt.

This guide walks through what an MCA defense attorney does, when to bring one in, the legal arguments that actually move these cases, and how to think about your options before the pressure gets worse. It is written for owners who need clarity fast, not legalese.

The most important thing to understand up front is that MCA disputes reward speed. The tools funders rely on — confessions of judgment, account restraints, UCC liens — are designed to work quickly and quietly, often before an owner realizes how serious the situation has become. The owners who come out of these disputes in the best shape are almost always the ones who got advice early, while they still had leverage and choices. The ones who struggle most are usually those who waited, hoped it would resolve on its own, and reached out only after a judgment landed or an account froze.

Quick answer An MCA defense attorney represents business owners against merchant cash advance funders — challenging the agreement, fighting confessions of judgment, negotiating settlements or restructures, and defending collection lawsuits. You typically need one the moment you can no longer make payments, receive a legal notice, or discover a UCC lien or account freeze.

What Is a Merchant Cash Advance — and Why It Isn’t a Loan

A merchant cash advance (MCA) is not technically a loan. It is structured as the purchase of your future receivables at a discount. The funder gives you a lump sum today in exchange for the right to collect a set amount of your future sales, usually through fixed daily or weekly ACH debits from your business bank account. Because it is framed as a sale rather than a loan, funders argue it falls outside state usury laws that cap interest rates.

That single distinction — sale versus loan — is the fault line beneath nearly every MCA dispute. A well-drafted MCA agreement is supposed to tie the funder’s recovery to your actual revenue: if sales slow, payments should shrink through a reconciliation provision. In practice, many agreements are written or enforced so that the funder collects a fixed amount regardless of how your business is doing. When that happens, the arrangement starts to look far more like a high-interest loan than a genuine purchase of receivables, and that is exactly where a defense attorney goes to work.

The features that make MCAs so aggressive

  • Effective rates that can exceed 100% APR once the factor rate and short repayment window are converted into annualized terms.
  • Confessions of judgment (COJs) — a signed document letting the funder obtain a court judgment without notice or a hearing if you default.
  • Personal guarantees that expose your personal assets even though the advance went to the business.
  • UCC liens filed against your business assets, which can disrupt relationships with other creditors and processors.
  • Stacking — taking multiple advances at once — which compounds daily withdrawals until cash flow collapses.

How an MCA compares to traditional business financing

Seeing the differences side by side explains why MCA disputes escalate so much faster than ordinary loan defaults.

FeatureMerchant Cash AdvanceTraditional Bank Loan
Legal structurePurchase of future receivablesLoan with interest
RepaymentDaily/weekly ACH debitsFixed monthly installments
Effective costOften 40%–100%+ APR equivalentRegulated, disclosed APR
Usury capsFunders argue they don’t applyApply directly
Default remedyConfession of judgment, account freezeStandard lawsuit with notice
Speed to fund24–72 hoursWeeks

What an MCA Defense Attorney Actually Does

An MCA defense attorney is a lawyer who represents the business owner — the merchant — rather than the funder. Their job is to level a field that is deliberately tilted. Most MCA agreements are drafted by the funder’s counsel, contain choice-of-law and venue clauses favoring the funder’s home state, and are backed by collection tactics designed to make fighting back feel pointless. A defense attorney’s work generally falls into five areas.

1. Reviewing and challenging the agreement

The first thing a competent attorney does is read the actual contract — not the marketing summary the funder sent. They look for whether the reconciliation provision is real or illusory, whether the agreement functions as a disguised loan, whether the factor rate produces a usurious effective rate, and whether the funder followed its own terms. If the agreement is a loan in disguise, entire state usury and licensing defenses may open up.

2. Fighting confessions of judgment

The confession of judgment is the funder’s favorite weapon. It lets them walk into a courthouse — historically often in New York — and obtain a judgment against you without you ever being notified. A defense attorney can move to vacate an improperly entered judgment, challenge whether the COJ was validly executed, and raise the significant legal reforms that have restricted COJ use against out-of-state businesses in recent years.

3. Negotiating settlements and restructures

Not every case goes to trial — and most owners don’t want it to. A large part of MCA defense is negotiation: reducing the balance, lowering or pausing daily withdrawals, consolidating stacked advances, and structuring a payment plan the business can actually survive. Funders often prefer a realistic settlement to an uncollectable judgment, and an attorney who understands the funder’s incentives can find that number.

4. Defending collection lawsuits and account freezes

When a funder sues or freezes your account, deadlines matter enormously. An attorney responds to the complaint, asserts affirmative defenses and counterclaims, fights to release frozen funds, and pushes back on UCC liens and third-party garnishments that can choke off your revenue overnight.

5. Asserting affirmative claims against the funder

Defense isn’t always passive. Where funders have engaged in usurious lending, unlicensed lending, breach of the reconciliation obligation, or unfair and deceptive practices, an attorney can turn the tables with counterclaims — sometimes shifting the leverage in a case entirely.

When Do You Need an MCA Defense Attorney?

Timing is everything in these disputes. The earlier you get advice, the more options you keep. Here are the signals that it’s time to make the call.

  • You can no longer make the daily or weekly payments — or you’re borrowing from one advance to pay another.
  • You’ve requested reconciliation and been ignored or refused, even though your revenue has clearly dropped.
  • You received a legal notice, summons, or judgment — especially from a court in another state.
  • Your business bank account was frozen or restrained without warning.
  • A UCC lien has appeared against your business assets or receivables.
  • You’ve stacked multiple advances and the combined withdrawals now exceed what the business generates.
  • The funder is contacting your customers or processor directly, threatening your commercial relationships.

If any of these describe your situation, waiting rarely helps. Once a judgment is entered or an account is frozen, the attorney’s job shifts from prevention to damage control — and the outcomes narrow accordingly.

The Legal Defenses That Actually Work

MCA defense is not about wishful thinking. It rests on a handful of arguments that courts have taken seriously. A capable attorney evaluates which apply to your specific agreement and jurisdiction.

Usury — the disguised-loan argument

If a court determines that an MCA is really a loan rather than a true purchase of receivables, state usury caps can apply — and rates far above those caps can render the agreement void or unenforceable. Courts weigh factors like whether repayment is truly contingent on the merchant’s sales, whether there’s a real reconciliation mechanism, and whether the funder bears genuine risk of loss. The more the deal guarantees the funder a fixed return regardless of business performance, the more it looks like a loan.

This is why the reconciliation clause matters so much. A genuine purchase of receivables means the funder shares your downside: if sales drop, so does what they collect. When an agreement pays lip service to reconciliation but the funder refuses to actually adjust withdrawals, that gap between the written promise and real-world conduct becomes evidence that the transaction was a loan all along. An experienced attorney gathers your bank records and payment history precisely to build that picture — showing the court that the funder never truly bore the risk it claimed to.

Breach of the reconciliation provision

Many agreements promise that if your revenue falls, your payments will be adjusted downward. When funders refuse to honor that promise, they may be in breach of their own contract — a powerful defense and, in some cases, the basis for a counterclaim.

Improper or void confessions of judgment

COJs must meet strict procedural requirements, and legal reforms have limited their enforceability against out-of-state debtors. A judgment entered on a defective COJ can be challenged and, in the right circumstances, vacated.

Unlicensed lending and regulatory violations

A growing number of states now require commercial financing disclosures or licensing for certain MCA activity. Where a funder operated without required licensing or failed to make mandated disclosures, additional defenses may be available.

Unconscionability and deceptive practices

When the terms are so one-sided, or the sales process so misleading, that enforcement would be fundamentally unfair, courts have room to intervene. This is fact-specific, but it can matter alongside the stronger structural defenses above.

What to Expect When You Hire an MCA Defense Attorney

Understanding the process removes some of the fear. While every case differs, most follow a recognizable arc.

  • Case review. The attorney examines your MCA agreement, payment history, bank records, and any legal notices to map your exposure and identify defenses.
  • Strategy and leverage assessment. They determine whether the goal is to negotiate a settlement, defend a lawsuit, vacate a judgment, or pursue affirmative claims — and how strong your position is.
  • Communication takeover. Once retained, the attorney often becomes the point of contact, which alone can quiet the daily calls and pressure.
  • Negotiation or litigation. Depending on strategy, they either open settlement talks or file the necessary responses and motions to protect you in court.
  • Resolution and protection going forward. The endpoint might be a reduced settlement, a restructured payment plan, a released account, or a dismissed case — plus guidance to avoid the same trap again.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can an MCA defense attorney really reduce what I owe?

Often, yes. Through negotiation or by asserting valid defenses, attorneys frequently reduce balances, lower withdrawals, or restructure payments into something a business can sustain. The strength of the outcome depends on the agreement, the funder, and how early you act.

Is a merchant cash advance legal?

MCAs themselves are legal, but specific agreements or practices may not be. If an MCA functions as a disguised loan at a usurious rate, or a funder violates licensing or disclosure rules, the agreement or certain terms may be unenforceable.

What happens if I just stop paying my MCA?

Stopping payments without a strategy is risky. Funders may file a confession of judgment, freeze your account, or sue. If you can’t keep paying, that’s precisely the moment to speak with a defense attorney rather than going silent.

Can a funder freeze my bank account?

Through a judgment or certain legal mechanisms, funders can restrain business accounts. An attorney can move to release frozen funds and challenge the underlying judgment or lien.

What is a confession of judgment and why does it matter?

A confession of judgment is a document you may have signed allowing the funder to obtain a court judgment against you without notice or a hearing. It’s one of the most powerful tools funders use — and one an attorney can often challenge when it was improperly entered.

How much does an MCA defense attorney cost?

Fee structures vary — flat fees, hourly rates, or contingency arrangements depending on the case. Many providers offer an initial consultation so you can understand your options before committing. Always ask how fees work up front.

How quickly should I contact an attorney?

As soon as you anticipate trouble — a missed payment, a refused reconciliation, a legal notice, or a frozen account. Deadlines in collection cases are short, and early action preserves the most options.

The Stacking Trap: How Multiple Advances Compound the Problem

One of the most dangerous patterns in the MCA world is stacking — taking a second, third, or fourth advance while earlier ones are still being repaid. It usually starts innocently: the first advance’s daily withdrawals are squeezing cash flow, so the owner takes another advance to cover the gap. Now two funders are pulling from the same account every business day. When that isn’t enough, a third arrives. Within weeks, the combined debits can exceed the revenue the business actually produces.

Stacking creates a spiral that’s hard to escape without help. Each funder may claim priority over the same receivables, UCC liens pile up, and one funder discovering the others can trigger a default. For a defense attorney, stacked advances are complex but also full of leverage — competing claims to the same collateral, potential breaches, and multiple agreements that can each be scrutinized and negotiated. Consolidating stacked advances into a single manageable arrangement is one of the most common and valuable outcomes an attorney can pursue.

Mistakes to Avoid When You’re Behind on an MCA

How owners react in the early days of trouble often determines how the whole dispute plays out. A few common missteps make everything harder.

  • Ignoring legal notices. Summons and court filings carry hard deadlines. Missing one can hand the funder a default judgment.
  • Taking another advance to cover the last one. Stacking rarely solves cash-flow problems and usually accelerates the collapse.
  • Emptying or abandoning the business account. Moving money to dodge debits can look like fraud and damage your defenses.
  • Signing anything the funder sends without review. Amendments and “settlement” documents can waive rights or add new confessions of judgment.
  • Trying to negotiate blind. Without knowing your defenses, you don’t know your leverage — and funders count on that.
  • Waiting until a judgment is entered. Prevention is far easier than vacating a judgment after the fact.

How to Choose the Right MCA Defense Attorney

Not every business attorney handles merchant cash advance disputes, and the specifics matter. When evaluating your options, look for:

  • Focused MCA experience — familiarity with reconciliation clauses, COJs, stacking, and funder tactics.
  • Multi-state reach, since funders often litigate in their home states.
  • A clear strategy tailored to your goal — settlement, litigation, or vacating a judgment.
  • Transparent fees explained before you sign anything.
  • Responsiveness, because timing drives these cases.

Getting Connected to the Right Help

CredibleLaw is a national referral network that connects business owners with experienced MCA defense attorneys — it is not a law firm and does not provide legal representation itself. If you’re facing daily withdrawals you can no longer sustain, a confession of judgment, a frozen account, or a UCC lien, the network can help match you with counsel experienced in merchant cash advance disputes.

Learn more at https://crediblelaw.com/ or call (888) 201-0441 to be connected with an attorney who can review your situation. The sooner you understand your options, the more of them you’ll have.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. CredibleLaw is an attorney referral network, not a law firm, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. Consult a licensed attorney about your specific situation.